Fair Value Gaps: The Blueprint Institutions Don’t Want You To Know

Wiki Article

Professional traders have long relied on Fair Value Gaps to time entries with almost surgical precision—often before the rest of the market even realizes what’s happening.

In the framework used by Plazo Sullivan, FVGs are treated as evidence of institutional displacement—and therefore prime zones for high-probability entries.

Where Fair Value Gaps Come From

An FVG represents an inefficiency—an area where price moved too fast for opposing traders to fill orders.

The Institutional Logic Behind FVGs

This creates natural magnets: price will typically revisit these imbalances to test, mitigate, or confirm order flow.

The FVG Trading Model Used by Elite Traders
Look for Strong Institutional Moves

Before an FVG matters, there must be displacement—strong, directional movement marked by high volume or momentum.

Outline the Exact Imbalance Zone

This is the region where price is likely to return.

Patience here Creates Precision

Institutions use these pullbacks to reload positions at favorable pricing.

Bias Before Execution

Plazo Sullivan Roche Capital’s bias framework—weekly, daily, liquidity mapping—acts as the filter that upgrades an FVG from “possible” to “high-probability.”

Imbalances Work Both Ways

Marking both bullish and bearish gaps creates natural take-profit levels.

Why FVG Trading Works

Fair Value Gaps give traders a rare glimpse into algorithmic intent.

Combine FVG logic with market structure, liquidity pools, and volume confirmation, and you have one of the strongest frameworks available to retail traders today—one that aligns perfectly with the advanced methodologies taught inside Plazo Sullivan Roche Capital.

FVGs aren’t signals—they’re context.
And once you learn their language, the market starts to speak back.